Vaccine Genetically Engineers People to Stop Smoking: Planned for Children

 Credit: iStockphoto

'An upcoming vaccine contains a genetically engineered virus designed to infect the liver, forcing it to make antibodies against nicotine. In other words, its purpose is to genetically engineer humans to control behavior.

They’re already talking about giving it to children.

'The vaccine contains a virus genetically engineered to carry an artificial anti-nicotine antibody called NIC9D9.The genetically engineered virus is called AAVantiNic.

After injection, its purpose is to infect the liver, forcing DNA changes that result in production of NIC9D9.

If it works as planned, this genetic change will be permanent. This is not like most disease vaccines, which cause the body to create antibodies against an injected substance. The artificial nature of that process results in the antibody production being temporary, thus requiring repeat doses of the vaccine.'

Read more...

Read more »

Vaccine Information Week October 1st

 

'In an effort to educate millions worldwide, leading natural health experts from around the globe are teaming up to launch a new campaign entitled Vaccine Information Week. Launching on the 1st of October 2011, the initiative will include hundreds of articles and documents unveiling new developments in the field of vaccine research and information. 

With the primary focus of the campaign to help consumers make an educated choice when it comes to vaccinating, the campaign will seek to shed light on little-known scientific findings that are instrumental to individuals when deciding whether or not to vaccinate. Many of the articles unveiled with the launch of the campaign will center in on the dangers of this season’s flu vaccine, which the vaccine industry has already begun pushing on citizens nationwide.

With legal immunity now granted to vaccine makers, the best proverbial weapon in the intellectual war over the effectiveness of vaccines is to educate and inform the public. The thousands of surveys, studies, trials, and anecdotal experiences regarding vaccines are worth nothing if they are not adequately presented to the general public. Thanks to the large number of organizations participating in the campaign and/or carrying articles published by the campaign writers, millions across the globe will be exposed to explosive vaccine documentation. The volume and quality of the articles and studies may also hit the mainstream media, leading to an overflow of information going supernova into the newsfeeds of the world.'

Read more...

Read more »

Family to Receive $1.5M in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award

Nine-year-old Hannah Poling is shown. (AP Photo/Atlanta Journal-Constitution, John Spink)

Posted by Sharyl Attkisson

The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.

In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.

Hannah was described as normal, happy and precocious in her first 18 months.

Then, in July 2000, she was vaccinated against nine diseases in one doctor's visit: measles, mumps, rubella, polio, varicella, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, and Haemophilus influenzae.

Afterward, her health declined rapidly. She developed high fevers, stopped eating, didn't respond when spoken to, began showing signs of autism, and began having screaming fits. In 2002, Hannah's parents filed an autism claim in federal vaccine court. Five years later, the government settled the case before trial and had it sealed. It's taken more than two years for both sides to agree on how much Hannah will be compensated for her injuries.

Read Sharyl Attkisson's 2008 report on Hannah Poling

In acknowledging Hannah's injuries, the government said vaccines aggravated an unknown mitochondrial disorder Hannah had which didn't "cause" her autism, but "resulted" in it. It's unknown how many other children have similar undiagnosed mitochondrial disorder. All other autism "test cases" have been defeated at trial. Approximately 4,800 are awaiting disposition in federal vaccine court.

Time Magazine summed up the relevance of the Poling case in 2008: ...(T)here's no denying that the court's decision to award damages to the Poling family puts a chink -- a question mark -- in what had been an unqualified defense of vaccine safety with regard to autism. If Hannah Poling had an underlying condition that made her vulnerable to being harmed by vaccines, it stands to reason that other children might also have such vulnerabilities."

Health Maven Note: Julie Gerberding is a well paid shill for the vaccine industry. Who cares what the Government says, Julie? The government and Big Pharma are in bed together. Julie recently graduated from director of the CDC to President of Merck's Vaccine Division. Perhaps, she was working for Merck before she was officially hired? I know--It's a crazy assumption. Do you really think the CDC, Big Pharma or careerists like Julie Gerberding genuinely care about you or your family?

ARTICLE CONTINUES:

Then-director of the Centers for Disease Control Julie Gerberding (who is now President of Merck Vaccines) stated: "The government has made absolutely no statement indicating that vaccines are a cause of autism. This does not represent anything other than a very specific situation and a very sad situation as far as the family of the affected child."

Read the newly-released decision on Hannah Poling's compensation.

Source CBS News (link fixed)

Read more »